Monday, December 6, 2010
Itunes mocks me with their “suggested movies” based on my “previous interest.” I admit I could be mistaken for a forty-five-year-old divorcee with the heavy dose of Jane Austen titles in my queue, but when The Jane Austen Book Club was suggested to me last night, I’d had enough. I rent movies on itunes so I need not to explain myself to Brian at Blockbuster, much like I buy the books on my Kindle whose store bought covers feature rouge lipstick.
To make matters worse, I’ve already seen the majority of itunes’ suggestions.
In the Vegas world of glitzy technology, the current heavy weights, Apple and Google, are training for their highly anticipated match up. While Apple subtly suggests Rocky Balboa to their employees, Google underwrites catnip, in hopes that YouTube’s infamous animals keep finding themselves in compromising positions. I think Snakes on a Plane, got its title, and possibly treatment, from a YouTube clip.
Apple and Google approach the ring with vastly different tactics. Google offers the Internet on a level playing, allowing viewers to filter through and determine popularity. Apple filters on viewers’ behalf, proudly offering a roasted pig chomping an apple atop a silver platter.
The dumping ground that is YouTube does not amuse me, but I also bet to win, so my money is on Google because they do not underestimate the want of individual thought and subsequent choice. Even if that individual thought involves a cat in a coffee can.
Last week I visited Amsterdam’s Science Center. Until now I omitted this day trip from the blog because apparently I haven’t learned my lesson from the zoo (recounted here). Again, I remembered why Chuck-E-Cheese does not allow adults entrance without an accompanying minor.
My single adulthood found itself out of place amongst strollers and primary colors until I found the ‘brain profile’ exhibit. Being the quintessential narcissistic Scorpio, I delight in people reiterating my individual traits, pinpointing roads I would be apt to travel in life.
After an hour of countless questionnaires reminiscent of second grade IQ tests, the habits of my brain patterns in varying fields were numerically dissected.
I repeatedly landed in a non-favoring limbo category. From “type of lover” to “left or right hemisphere,” my personality and brain patterns were split evenly over all possible categories in the chosen field. Not even inherent surges of estrogen could swell my language governing and emotionally charged right hemisphere into domination. This pattern caused my blood pressure to rise. The non-rhyming couplet “jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none” has taunted me my entire life.
I was setting up camp in Purgatory and penciling-in play dates with non-baptized infants, when the results of “what kind of learner are you” flashed on screen. Despite the possible five categories, “thinker’s brain” swallowed 92% of my brain space. That’s almost an A, my Scorpio narcissism beaming.
I knew Michelangelo would have my back come Judgment Day.
Michelangelo’s iconic image of Adam and God on the Sistine chapel is understood as a visual account when God gave life to Adam with a single touch, but it is puzzling that Adam’s eyes are open before their hands have touched. Michelangelo’s surviving notebooks tell us he did not believe his genius was in his hands, but rather in his head. A second look at this iconic image shows the red billowing fabric nestled behind God is a silhouette of the human brain. God gave life to man not with his first breath but with his first intellectual thought.
Somebody at Google must share my adoration of Michelangelo and his belief that the genius of people is found in their capacity for individual thought. That individual thought that causes humans to blindly cling to the power of their mouse-click-able choice.
Last night I decided to show itunes what I was made of and rented the antithesis to all things Jane Austen, Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut. It was a success. Jane’s estrogen clad characters and vacillating plots were cowering under embroidered duvets.
But tonight, no other voices, or masks.
You know something was good when its ending but you want to hold tight just a little longer, just to feel the pain a little bit more. The addictive properties of that physical manifestation of wanting are deadly powerful.
Both Jane Austen and Stanley Kubrick use wanting as the humanizing and communicative emotion to exploit characters. Despite genius and rationality, we are creatures of want, but perhaps that’s the genius of it.
Right now, I think I want to go home. My greatest fear in life has been not recognizing my own reflection and after two months alone its brilliance is at last vivid. The time has come, the walrus said. My time has come to couple rational thought with unabashed want. I want home, the familiarity, the warmth, I want him.
Supposedly, a ruthless amount of wanting will break the dykes and flood the land. I’ve already built my ark in anticipation as I vow the wanting and thinking wont cease because I think therefore I AMsterdam.




















